Marriage agreements carry out tend to indicate the period of time for the hence amarriage need to have chosen to take lay

1. Yet, into the genealogy, we all knowthat for each and every signal there clearly was an exception. A beneficial vexing section ofgenealogy would be the fact not one person very understands just how to utilize this new exclusions orrules that have one definitive adjective instance constantly, possibly, most likely,more than likely, an such like. It might be interesting in the event the around most other examples ofjointures getting produced a year or a few immediately following a known relationship day.

dos. Is there an enthusiastic extant dispensation for the relationships out of ElizabethClifford and you may Sir Ralph Bowes who were 3rd cousins through Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh otherwise 4th cousins, shortly after taken out of brand new 5th LordClifford? Who narrow down the relationship go out.

Arthur

Allegedly, in the event that a dispensation try wanted and you will granted, it would havebeen by the among following, and could come in new correspondingregister book, if this endures:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop out-of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop off Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop from York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop from Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop away from Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop of Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop away from Carlisle 1509-1520

5. If for example the 10th Lord Clifford really does marry in early 1487 [state January] andhas Age later on in this seasons, really does the kissbrides.com investigate this site latest chronology perhaps not performs?

John hands?

E produced for the later 1487, Henry created from inside the 1488/9, Joan within the ,an such like. filling in this new brands of your publish away from . In the event that (a) thechronology however work; and you can (b) their own matrimony bit wasn’t reasonable; thenwe simply have the fresh new 1505 pedigree out-of Henry VII’s that is when you look at the oppositionto the fresh new conjecture one she is a valid daughter.

6. Concerning your 1505 pedigree: Certainly are the Clifford daughters new onlyknown Henry VII interactions excluded? Are there someone else? If so,would not one to mirror defectively with this document as the a source?

From evaluations You will find produced from the c.1505 Henry VII Connections pedigreeswith the 1480-1500 Visitation of your North pedigrees, being

In the c.1505 Interactions pedigrees, new Clifford children are not listedin a Clifford pedigree, but rather in the St. John pedigree. As the I’mnot always the latest St. John family unit members, following the ‘s the pointers asit seems from the c.1505 pedigree, because obtained from brand new 1834 Coll. Best. etGen. blog post. The fresh new phrasing into the quotations is precisely whilst appears inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).

“No. XII.”From my personal Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Pole, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, together with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess out of Somerset got around three husbands.” By the “John Duke ofSomerset” she had “My Woman the King’s Mom.” who’d “The latest Queen.” whohad “Prince “From the “Sir Oliver Saint John, basic partner.” she had step three daus & 2 sons:

A beneficial. “Edith, wedded to Geoffrey Rod out of Buckinghamshire.” They’d:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. wedded on the Lady Margaret, dau. out-of theDuke regarding Clarence.” That they had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married to help you Ralph Verney, Esq.” That they had: “John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[an alternative child, unnamed].”

B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He had four people:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who’d “Five daughters and you can oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. so you’re able to Harry Lord Clifford.” That they had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, son and you can heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Elizabeth, married so you’re able to Thomas Kent, Esq. of Lincolnshire.”B4. “A good Nun of Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”

C. “Dame Mary, wedded to help you Sir Richard Frognall.” They had:C1. “Edmond Frognall and his awesome brethren and sistren.” With issueindicated, yet not titled.C2. “Elizabeth, married to help you Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”

D. “Age, married basic on Lord Zouche; after into LordScrope of Bolton.” Issue:D1. [by the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They’d:”Elizabeth. George. John. William.”D2. [by the Scrope] ” Conyers.” That have issueindicated not titled.

Margaret Duchess regarding Somerset, of the “Lionel Lord Welles, history partner.”had: “John Viscount Welles, married Cecily, dau. out of K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Age.”