‘ Reg Aven 215, 50To the latest bishop off Moray. Faculty to help you distribute Reginald Cheyn,donzel, and you may Murielle, damselle, d de- Keth,regarding Moray and you can Aberdeen dioceses, regarding obstacle in order to marriagearising on third and you may last level off consanguinity.Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step 1.SRO Vat. , iv, no. 46. ‘

1420), are contracted so you can get married Reginald le Cheyne, child ofSir Reginald ce Cheyne by the their spouse (as the her basic spouse), Helen ofStrathearn. Whenever you are discover renowned gaps on ancestry of MurielKeith, she and you may Reginald ce Cheyne perform show a lineage out-of theComyns. However, this really is too faraway to need a dispensation ifMuriel are a beneficial great-great-higher grandd Comyn, Earlof Buchan (d. 1233), which could function as instance if is why daughter.

Trans

dos. Reginald ce Cheyne try a beneficial-grandson regarding Marjory Comyn,daughter out-of Alexander Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan (d. 1290), sonof William Comyn mentioned above. Their child was Malise, Earlof Strathearn out-of 1312 so you can their passing inside 1328 , andgrandfather off Reginald.

ca. 1270), wasidentical so you can Marjory Comyn, and you may hitched 2ndly to Malise, Earl ofStrathearn (d. 1312). This would mean the brand new parentage ‘said in order to havebeen’ that Margaret, spouse of Sir John de- Keith, was from onegeneration: she would n’t have come new d Comyn,Earl away from Buchan, but alternatively out-of their young buck Alexander. There’s noevidence that Earl Malise and you can Marjory Comyn was basically partnered muchbefore 1275: just like the Lindsay blogged,

Discover you to definitely discernable base about what the relationshipbetween Reginald ce Cheyne and you may Muriel Keith might have resided: ifMargaret Comyn, wife off Sir John de- Keith (d

‘ The fresh new partner associated with the earl, on 1275, is named Marjory, as weunderstand the latest attesting condition from Zero. cv., which is stated byWyntoun, Book VIII. man. vi., to own started another sisterof John Comyn, Earl away from Buchan, exactly who discussed on behalf ofEarl Malise the marriage settlement above mentioned [old atLondon, April twenty-six, 1293 to own his child Matilda and you can Robert deTony, son from Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = Age de QuincyE from Buchan I__________________I________________We III1) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de- Keith I (als I E away from . 1270 We Margaret) We d. 1312_____________I__ ___I__________________________I I I We We ISir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maudde Keith de- Keith E away from = Robertd. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de TonyI ______I_______________________We I We ISir Edward Malise Mary Helen= Isabella de Elizabeth out-of Strathearn = 1) Sir ReginaldSynton d. ca. 1343 I le CheyneI I We = 2) Sir DavidI V We I de- GrahamSir William de- I I__________Keith We I= Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V__I_____________ We We IIII We We We Isiblings> Muriel + Reginald Mary MariotaKeith le Cheyne(= RobertStewart,Duke out of Albany)

Reginald ce Cheyne likely never ever married Muriel Keith, and you will isknown getting died sine prole. Robert Stewart and you will Muriel Keithhad a good dispensation so you’re able to marry dated cuatro Will get 1380, very Reginald likelydied sometime prior to that go out , probably up until the kissbrides.com Moja stranica plannedmarriage took place. This services, in addition tocorrecting this new Keith-Comyn ancestry, also augment same withdescents out of Roger de- Quincy, Earl away from Winchester and his awesome wifeElen/Helen away from Galloway (as well as Magna Carta, Carolingian andother interesting origins).

SP VIII:247, sub _Old Earls away from Strathearn_. Look for alsoWilliam Alexander Lindsay, K.C., Windsor Herald; John Dowden,D.D., LL.D.; and you will John Maitland Thomson, LL.D., eds., Charters,Bulls or any other Files relating to the Abbey from Inchaffray(Edinburgh: T. and A good. Constable, 1908 – Scottish HistorySociety, third Collection, Vol. 56), pp. lxvii-lxix.

John P was same as Marjory Comyn, and you will married 2ndly so you’re able to Malise, Earl regarding Strathearn (d. 1312). This should indicate new parentage ‘said having been’ compared to Margaret, partner out-of Sir John de Keith, was out-of you to generation: she would n’t have become the new d Comyn, Earl regarding Buchan, but alternatively out of his young man Alexander. There isn’t any proof one to Earl Malise and you can Marjory Comyn was basically married much prior to 1275 >>